[CCMC 13429-R] CCMC Canadian code compliance evaluation

From: National Research Council Canada

CCMC number:

13429-R

Status:

Active

Issue date:

2009-01-12

Modified date:

2023-02-27

Evaluation holder:

Derby Building Products Inc.

160, rue des Grands Lacs
St-Augustin-de-Desmaures QC G3A 2K1
Canada
Website: www.novik.com
Telephone: 418-878-6161
Email: info@novik.com

Product names:

Beach House Shake®
TandoShake®
TandoStone®

Code compliance:

NBC 2015, OBC

Evaluation requirements:

CCMC-TG-074633.04-15 "CCMC Technical Guide for Polypropylene Siding"

In most jurisdictions this document is sufficient evidence for approval by Canadian authorities.

Learn more about CCMC recognition Look for the trusted CCMC mark on products to verify compliance.

Code compliance opinion

National Building Code of Canada 2015

ID	Code provision	Solution type
09-27-02-00-00-0-00	9.27.2. Required Protection from Precipitation	Acceptable
09-27-03-00-00-0-00	9.27.3. Second Plane of Protection	Acceptable
09-27-12-00-00-0-00	9.27.12. Vinyl Siding	Alternative

Ontario Building Code

Ruling No. 10-06-243 (13429-R) authorizing the use of this product in Ontario, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Ruling, was made by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on 2012-04-12 (revised 2021-04-16) pursuant to s.29 of the Building Code Act, 1992 (see Ruling for terms and conditions). This Ruling is subject to periodic revisions and updates.

The above opinion is based on the evaluation by the CCMC of technical evidence provided by the evaluation holder, and is bound by the stated conditions and limitations. For the benefit of the user, a summary of the technical information that forms the basis of this evaluation has been included.

Product information

Product names

Beach House Shake®
TandoShake®
TandoStone®

Product description

The wall siding panels and corners are made of injection-molded, press-formed polypropylene and are fastened to the building structure with corrosion-resistant fasteners every 200 mm (8 in.) through pre-punched nailing slots located along the top edge of the panel, which are concealed once the upper panel is installed. The products and associated profiles evaluated under CCMC 13429-R are shown in Table 1. The products have a nail hem wall thicknesses between of 2.0 mm and 2.3 mm.

Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate TandoStone^® Stacked Stone and Beach House Shake^® as an example of the profiles, respectively.

Table 1. Evaluated products, profiles and panel sizes
Product name	Profile name	Panel size, mm (length × width)
Beach House Shake®	--	1 191 × 419
TandoStone®	Brick	1 121 × 472
	Hand-Cut Stone	1 122 × 467
	Stacked Stone	1 127 × 492
TandoShake®	Creek Ledgestone	1 159 × 495
	Cape Cod Perfection	1 191 × 419
	Hand Split	1 019 × 476
	R&R 4.5	1 108 × 392
	RoughSawn Cedar Dual	1 501 × 381
	RoughSawn Cedar Single	2 286 × 216
	RoughSawn Staggered	1 502 × 389
	Rustic Cedar 6	2 426 × 216
	Rustic Cedar 9	1 851 × 292
	Scalloped Perfection	1 502 × 381

A drawing of "TandoStone® Stacked Stone". — Figure 1. TandoStone^®Stacked Stone

A drawing of Beach House Shake®. — Figure 2. Beach House Shake^®

Manufacturing plant

This evaluation is valid only for products produced at the following plant:

Product names	Manufacturing plant
Product names	St-Augustin-de-Desmaures, QC, CA
Beach House Shake®	Product evaluated by the CCMC
TandoShake®	Product evaluated by the CCMC
TandoStone®	Product evaluated by the CCMC

Product evaluated by the CCMC Indicates that the product from this manufacturing facility has been evaluated by the CCMC

Conditions and limitations

The CCMC’s compliance opinion is bound by this product being used in accordance with the conditions and limitations set out below.

The products are limited to use as exterior siding for the buildings falling within the scope of Part 9, Housing and Small Buildings, of Division B of the NBC 2015.
The siding panels must be installed on furring providing a second line of defence that consists of a continuous, clear, uninterrupted air space of 19 mm outboard of the sheathing membrane.
The furring must be installed over the sheathing membrane.
The system requires flashing at appropriate locations in order to drain water to the outside.
Furring for the attachment of the siding must be securely nailed to the sheathing or framing, spaced at 200 mm on centre (o.c.), and be not less than 19 mm × 38 mm.
The fasteners shall be minimum 38 mm galvanized smooth-shank nails.
The products shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s current installation instructions.
The product must be clearly identified with the phrase “CCMC 13429-R” on its packaging.

Technical information

This evaluation is based on demonstrated conformance with the following criteria:

Evaluation requirements
Criteria number	Criteria name
CCMC-TG-074633.04-15	CCMC Technical Guide for Polypropylene Siding

The evaluation holder has submitted technical documentation for CCMC’s evaluation. Testing was conducted at laboratories recognized by the CCMC. The corresponding technical evidence for this product is summarized below.

Material requirements

Physical properties

Table 2. Results of testing the physical properties of the TandoStone^® Stacked Stone
Property	Requirement	Test method	Result
Impact resistance (N·m)	≥ 3.95	ASTM D 7254	Pass
Weathering	No structural changes or visible surface changes such as peeling, chipping, cracking, flaking or pitting.	ASTM D 7254	Pass

Performance requirements

Wind load resistance

Table 3. Results of testing the wind load resistance of TandoShake^® RoughSawn Cedar Dual at Q₅₀ < 1.00 kPa^{Table footnote footnote (1)}
Property	Requirement^{Table footnote footnote (2)}^{Table footnote footnote (3)}	Result
Deformation (sustained pressure)	Sustained for 1 h ≥ 1 000 Pa	Pass
Repeated positive and negative pressure test (cyclic pressure), 2 000 cycles	1 460 Pa	Pass
Safety test (gust loads)	2 180 Pa	Pass

Notes

Footnote 1

The wind load resistance test was performed on a back-up wall consisting of 38 mm × 89 mm wood studs and 11.1 mm oriented strandboard (OSB) sheathing. The spacing between each stud section was 406 mm o.c. The 19 mm × 38 mm wood furring strips were installed at 203 mm o.c. spacing and fastened using 6d common nails. Each siding panel was installed using 38 mm galvanized smooth-shank nails at 203 mm o.c. on furring strips.

Return to table footnote footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

The table is intended for non-post-disaster low-rise buildings that have a height from grade to the uppermost roof of 12 m or less, which are located within a built-up area no less than 120 m away from the boundary between this area and open terrain, including bodies of water upwind of the building.

Return to table footnote footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

The table does not take into account the site-specific topographic factor Ct, where Ct = 1.0, except for buildings that are constructed on hills or escarpments with a slope defined in Article 4.1.7.4., Topographic Factor, of Division B of the NBC 2015. For buildings constructed on hills and escarpments, anticipated wind pressures may be greater.

Return to table footnote footnote 3 referrer

Table 4. Results of testing the wind load resistance of TandoStone^® Stacked Stone at Q₅₀ < 0.45 kPa^{Table footnote footnote (1)}
Property	Requirement^{Table footnote footnote (2)}^{Table footnote footnote (3)}	Result
Deformation (sustained pressure)	Sustained for 1 h ≥ 450 Pa	Pass
Repeated positive and negative pressure test (cyclic pressure), 2000 cycles	660 Pa	Pass
Safety test (gust loads)	980 Pa	Pass

Notes

Footnote 1

The wind load resistance test was performed on a back-up wall consisting of 38 mm × 89 mm wood studs and 11.9 mm plywood sheathing. The spacing between each stud section was 406 mm o.c. The 19 mm × 38 mm wood furring strips were installed at 203 mm o.c. spacing and fastened using 6d common nails. Each siding panel was installed using 50.8 mm galvanized smoothshank nails at 203 mm o.c. on furring strips.

Return to table footnote footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Return to table footnote footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Return to table footnote footnote 3 referrer

Additional performance data

Data in this section does not form part of the CCMC’s opinion in the code compliance opinion section.

Fire performance

Table 5. Results of fire performance testing of TandoStone^® Stacked Stone^{Table footnote footnote (1)}
Property	Test method	Results
Flame-spread rating (FSR)^{Table footnote footnote (2)}	CAN/ULC-S102	110
Smoke developed classification (SDC)^{Table footnote footnote (2)}	CAN/ULC-S102	> 500 (estimated)^{Table footnote footnote (1)}

Administrative information

Disclaimer

This evaluation is issued by the Canadian Construction Materials Centre (CCMC), a part of the Construction Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). The evaluation must be read in the context of the entire CCMC Registry of Product Assessments and the legislated applicable building code in effect.

The CCMC was established in 1988 on behalf of the applicable regulator (i.e., the provinces and territories) to ensure—through assessment—conformity of alternative and acceptable solutions to regional building codes as determined by the local authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) as part of the issuance of a building permit.

It is the responsibility of the local AHJs, design professionals, and specifiers to confirm that the evaluation is current and has not been withdrawn or superseded by a later issue. Please refer to the website or contact:

Canadian Construction Materials Centre
Construction Research Centre
National Research Council of Canada
1200 Montreal Road
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0R6
Telephone: 613-993-6189
Fax: 613-952-0268

The NRC has evaluated the material, product, system or service described herein only for those characteristics stated herein. The information and opinions in this evaluation are directed to those who have the appropriate degree of experience to use and apply its contents (i.e., AHJs, design professionals and specifiers). This evaluation is only valid when the product is installed in strict compliance with the stated conditions and limitations of evaluation and the applicable local building code. In circumstances where no applicable local building permit is issued and that no confirmation of compliance ‘for use in the intended field application’ is undertaken, this evaluation is null and void in all respects. This evaluation is provided without representation, warranty, or guarantee of any kind, expressed, or implied, and the NRC provides no endorsement for any evaluated material, product, system or service described herein. The NRC accepts no responsibility whatsoever arising in any way from any and all use and reliance on the information contained in this evaluation with respect to its compliance to the referenced code(s) and standard(s). The NRC is not undertaking to render professional or other services on behalf of any person or entity nor to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to another person or entity.

Language

Une version française de ce document est disponible.
In the case of any discrepancy between the English and French version of this document, the English version shall prevail.

Copyright

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the CCMC.

Code Compliance via Alternative Solutions

Where a design differs from the acceptable solutions in Division B, then it should be treated as an "alternative solution." A proponent of an alternative solution must demonstrate that the alternative solution addresses the same issues as the applicable acceptable solutions in Division B and their attributed objectives and functional statements. However, because the objectives and functional statements are entirely qualitative, demonstrating compliance with them in isolation is not possible. Therefore, Clause 1.2.1.1.(1)(b) identifies the principle that Division B establishes the quantitative performance targets that alternative solutions must meet. In many cases, these targets are not defined very precisely by the acceptable solutions [...] Nevertheless, Clause 1.2.1.1.(1)(b) makes it clear that an effort must be made to demonstrate that an alternative solution will perform as well as a design that would satisfy the applicable acceptable solutions in Division B—not “well enough” but “as well as.”

National Building Code of Canada, Sentence A-1.2.1.1.(1)(b)

The CCMC has determined that compliance with this provision of the Code has been demonstrated as an Alternative Solution. The evaluation report provides a summary of the basis of CCMC's compliance opinion.

CCMC's code compliance opinions

All CCMC evaluation reports are opinions of code compliance established in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada, Subsection 1.2.1. "Compliance with this Code," which requires compliance to be achieved by:

complying with the applicable acceptable solutions in Division B, or
using an alternative solution that will achieve at least the minimum level of performance required by Division B in the areas defined by the objective and functional statements attributed to the applicable acceptable solutions.

The CCMC assesses compliance with Canadian building, energy and safety codes, and is trusted by over 6,000 regulators across Canada.

Language selection

Search

[CCMC 13429-R] CCMC Canadian code compliance evaluation